A multi-centric dataset on patient-individual pathological lymph node involvement in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Dataset: We provide a dataset on lymph node metastases in 968 patients with newly diagnosed head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). All patients received neck dissection and we report the number of metastatic versus investigated lymph nodes per lymph node level (LNL) for every individual patient. Additionally, clinicopathological factors including T-category, primary tumor subsite (ICD-O-3 code), age, and sex are reported for all patients. The data is provided as three datasets: Dataset 1 contains 373 HNSCC patients treated at Centre Léon Bérard (CLB), France, with primary tumor location in the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx. Dataset 2 contains 332 HNSCC patients treated at the Inselspital, Bern University Hospital (ISB), Switzerland with primary tumor location in the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx. For these patients, additional information is provided including lateralization of the primary tumor, size and location of the largest metastases, and clinical involvement based on computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and/or 18FDG-positron emission tomography (PET/CT) imaging. Dataset 3 consists of 263 oropharyngeal SCC patients underlying a previous publication by Bauwens et al. [1], which were treated at CLB. For these patients, additional information including HPV status, lateralization of the primary tumor and clinically diagnosed lymph node involvement is provided. Reuse Potential: The data may be used to quantify the probability of occult lymph node metastases in each LNL, depending on an individual patient's characteristics of the primary tumor and the location of clinically diagnosed lymph node metastases. As such, the data may contribute to further personalize the elective treatment of the neck for HNSCC patients, i.e. definition of the elective clinical target volume (CTV-N) in radiotherapy (RT) and the extent of neck dissection (ND) in surgery. There exists only one similar publicly available dataset that reports clinical involvement per LNL in 287 oropharyngeal SCC patients [2]. The data presented in this article substantially extends the available data, it additionally includes pathologically assessed involvement per LNL, and it provides data for multiple subsites in the head and neck region.

Prevalence and distribution of cervical lymph node metastases in HPV-positive and HPV-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: In oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OP-SCC), the prevalence and distribution of clinical and pathological lymph node metastasis in the neck have been extensively reported. It served as the basis for consensus recommendations on the selection of the lymph node levels in the neck requiring a treatment. The objective of the study is to compare the prevalence and distribution of neck node metastases in HPV+ and HPV- OP-SCC from a large series of patients with OP-SCC who underwent a cervical lymph-node dissection (LND) as part of their treatment. METHODS: The study concentrated on OP-SCC patients treated by various neck node dissection (LND) procedures from January 2014 to December 2018 in 3 French institutions. Patients with prior head and neck cancer, prior neck surgery, the use of induction chemotherapy, or patients with carcinoma of unknown primary were excluded. HPV-status was assessed by p16 immunohistochemistry. For each patient, the clinical and the pathological nodal status, as well as the distribution of the positive nodes in each neck level (from Ia to V) were reported. RESULTS: Two-hundred and sixty-three patients were included (126 p16-negative (p16-), and 137 p16-positive (p16+). The rate of clinical positive node (cN+) reached 54% and 88.3% in the p16- and p16+ groups, respectively (p < 0.001); the corresponding rate of pathological positive node (pN+) reached 61.9% and 91.2%, respectively (p < 0.001). Regarding the clinical lymph node distribution, in p16+ patients, more positive nodes were observed in the ipsilateral level IV (p = 0.003), and less positive nodes were observed in the contralateral levels III and IV (p = 0.003 and p = 0.045, respectively). Regarding the pathologic lymph node distribution in the ipsilateral neck, in the cN0 patients, no significant difference was observed between p16- and p16+ patients (p = 0.33 to 1); in the cN+ patients, the nodes were distributed in levels Ib, II, III, IV and V without differences between the p16- and the p16+ patients. In the contralateral neck of p16- patients, nodes metastases were mainly observed in levels II, III and IV, whereas for the p16+ patients, positive nodes were only observed in level II (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the higher prevalence of cN+ and pN+ in p16+ OP-SCC patients, but without meaningful difference in the distribution of the lymph node drainage between p16- and p16+ OP-SCC. It indicates that no difference should be made between p16- and p16+ patients regarding the extend of neck treatment.